The account in my book is an expanded form of my New York Law Journal article Making Sense of “Shall”; go here for a PDF copy. Simon: The utility of shall depends on what kind of writing you’re dealing with. An official website of the United States government. Far better that lawyers become attuned to the nuances of verb use; my book provides a framework for that. Rising support from governments and several companies can help in the fight against this highly contagious disease. Learn about upcoming events and get the latest news from the federal plain language community. Small wonder, then, that the ABC rule has fast been gaining ground in the U.S. For example, the federal government’s Style Subcommittee—part of the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure—a subcommittee that since 1991 has worked on all amendments to the various sets of federal court rules, adopted this approach, disallowing shall, in late 1992. “Active screening” means that the employer must collect and review information to actively determine whether a person may enter a workplace. Can Can't Exercises 5-6-7 Mustn't vs Don't Have to Exercises 1 / 2 / 3 8-9-10 Must vs Have to / Has to Exercises 1 / 2 / 3 11. It could raise questions about whether different meanings are intended.”, Justice Canada’s Legislative Services Branch. Jeff Lagerquist. Will You can use "will" to create a promise--a contractual obligation. So, if you study hard, you can be sure to clear it. An Educational credential assessment (ECA) is used to verify that your foreign degree, diploma, or certificate (or other proof of your credential) is valid and equal to a Canadian one. People may sometimes tell you that there is no difference between shall and will, or even that today nobody uses shall (except in offers such as Shall I call a taxi?). The timing is a future or near future. Updated concurrently with lawblogs.ca On the other hand, if a party shall do something, that defines an obligation. There’s a recent trio of pieces in the Economist’s column on language, Johnson, that should be of interest to lawyers, as they all revolve around that tricky word “shall.” The fuss started when Robert Lane Greene, who edits the column and writes as R.L.G., praised the US government’s Federal Plain Language Guidelines [PDF] for recommending that writers drop “shall” and calling it that “officious and obsolete [word] that has encumbered legal style writing for many years.” That column racked up fifty comments, not all of them approving. And it’s the “not always” that’s the problem, of course. The ABC rule holds that legal drafters cannot be trusted to use the word shall under any circumstances. will = Under this view, lawyers are not educable on the subject of shall, so the only solution is complete abstinence. The modal verbs are can, could, may, might, must, ought to, shall, should, will and would. “Must” will often be used with a condition: “The City’s approval must be obtained before …”. Historically, prescriptive grammar stated that, when expressing pure futurity (without any additional meaning such as desire or command), shall was to be used when the subject was in the first person, and will in other … Yet the word frequently bears other meanings—sometimes even masquerading as a synonym of “may”. Shall I carry this bag for you? 4. However, this too, shall pass. I won’t say you must read them, but I think you ought to. We will/shall invite them to dinner. B.C. 6. Shall We Keep Using “Shall” or Must We Stop? 3. in a delicate contract between equals, to express both parties’ obligations. Worksheets - handouts. I shall be thirty next Friday. Although this isn’t a lie, it’s a gross inaccuracy. American lawyers and judges who try to restrict shall to the sense “has a duty to” find it difficult to apply the convention consistently. 1.to express a future contingency 1. One of the most important aspects of drafting a contract is the operative language--language that affects legal relationships. I shall begin the work tomorrow.. Video: shall / should. Why would anyone want to complicate the language and and lose the ability to employ such neatness of expression? More about this tool », A Canadian Model for Bridging the Private Governance of Online Speech in the Wake of New Privacy Proposed Legislation. It’s one more example of unnecessary lawyer talk. Makes good sense; so I shall not change unless I hear a convincing argument otherwise. The cases in which this court construed the word “may” in a statute as “shall,” or vice-versa, must be understood in context. Often, it’s true, “shall” is mandatory. They learn it by osmosis in law school, and the lesson is fortified in law practice. We are making … may not = is not permitted to; is disallowed from SHOULD NOT This phrase, or … "[F]inding the platforms, the innovations, to form a bridge between the traditional bricks-and-mortar legal environment we all know and the… more », The Brennan Centre for Justice (USA) published a great report in 2020 about "Principles for Continued Use of Remote Court… more », I really appreciate the work of the Task Force on Justice Issues Arising from COVID-19. Use “must” not “shall” to impose requirements. “Shall” isn’t plain English. Dropping “shall” is a major step in making your writing more user-friendly. The term ‘Shall’ was traditionally used to refer to the compulsory performance of some duty or obligation. You must go to the court house on Monday November 1. He had better get there by 10 a.m. (no later) We are supposed to keep these doors unlocked. It’s clear that shall has largely disappeared from everyday English; its role is now mostly limited to questions in the first person that seek direction or suggest weakly, ... Other words serve different functions. ; With the second and third person pronouns. Published: March 2011 Writing 79 (1992). Besides being outdated, “shall” is imprecise. However, this usage in federal legislation was at one time restricted to non-penal provisions and to sentences in which the subject was not a person. The directors shall have / must have / are to have experience in the management of airports. Ask a drafter what “shall” means, and you’ll hear that it’s a mandatory word—opposed to the permissive “may”. He shall carry out my instructions. 4. May / might. Shall and must. . Perhaps those who now so casually use “reticent” when they should say “reluctant” are not the kind of people who would ever have noticed or described the shy person, unwilling to put him- or herself forward, but those of us who do, can’t now be sure that our meaning is clear. You don’t need ‘may’ for the subjective mood – that’s all about possibility, doubt and ambiguity, and has a place in fine writing, but not in a contract. This solution leads to much greater consistency than is generally found in American drafting. 3. There is no obligation on the city; but its approval is a condition of the transaction. Many agencies already use the word “must” to convey obligations. I shall leave for Texas tomorrow. The only time to use it is when ‘shall’ = ‘has a duty to’. Shall, should, ought to - modal verbs exercises. Each test contains 10 questions. 5. Mixed modals - … Will / would. . Drafters should not use “must” and “shall” together in the same Act or regulation. We call "must" and "must not" words of obligation. When used in a contract, it creates an obligation. Scrutinize each use carefully. Conclusion . • Must is used when the subject is inanimate. I’ve stated elsewhere (for example, in this 2014 article) the advantages of using shall to express an obligation imposed on the subject of a sentence, if the subject is a party to the contract.. Lawyers drastically overuse shall, but as a solution, getting rid of shall requires that you throw the baby out with the bathwater. Indeed, few lawyers have the semantic acuity to identify correct and incorrect shalls even after a few hours of study. They have no -ing or -ed forms and do not add -s to the 3rd person singular form: He can speak three languages. Will you be kind enough to lend me your car? b) shall c) Either could be used here. 1. Michèle M. Asprey, Shall Must Go, 3 Scribes J. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course. We shall invite them to the party. Modals With Passive Voice 1 / 2 14. In the example sentences given above shall is used to talk about the strong possibility or certainty of an event or action which is going to take place in the future.. … 3. . – it is most important and necessary to clear the exam and hence there is no choice but to study hard for it. The same degradation has now struck “shall”. When “reticent” becomes a synonym for “reluctant”, we lose a word to describe a particular character trait. Whatever your personal drafting preferences, the Johnson column, the US PLAIN guidelines, and, of course, Garner’s book are valuable reads. "Must" is the only word that imposes a legal obligation on your readers to tell them something is mandatory. This solution—called the “American rule” because it is an approach followed by some careful American drafters—is to use shall only to mean “has a duty to.” Under the American rule, only the first of the eight bulleted items above would be correct. Second—and related to the first—it breeds litigation. Here's what law and policy say about "shall, will, may, and must." . Nobody says, “You shall finish the project in a week.”, For all these reasons, “must” is a better choice, and the change has already started to take place. “Must” is extensively used in the legislation of other jurisdictions, notably Australia and at least three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta and Manitoba) that have amended their Interpretation Acts to state that “must” is to b… It is sad that so many developments in colloquial English diminish the precision on the language. That being so, there can hardly be much hope of the profession’s using shall consistently. Can / could - exercises. Revised: May 2011. Must / Mustn't / Needn't / Have to 12-13. After finishing a test, you can review your answers. This machine will work well without giving you any trouble. However, prohibitions should be drafted in the form of “X must not”, rather than “no X must”. As with any aspect of usage, his discriptivist approach made a prescriptivist rule dissolve away — though, these two attitudes towards usage address quite different domains, in my view, and to pit them against each other is a kind of category mistake. The issue then was whether the power or duty to act was discretionary or mandatory. Bryan Garner, Legal Writing in Plain English, 2001, pp 105-06. Another solution is the “ABC rule,” so called because, in the late 1980s, it was most strongly advocated by certain Australian, British, and Canadian drafters. It’s not that common to need to negate a discretion in a contract – more often than not, if you think you want to say ‘may not’, you actually need to say ‘shall not’. And if you want to say “if the vendor shall have failed to observe or perform the obligations in clause [blob]” you have rather more problems with your drafing than poor use of ‘shall’. Under this view, lawyers are not educable on the subject of shall, so the only solution is complete abstinence. (command) 7. 2. ought to – you ought to study hard to clear the exam – that’s the key to clear the exam – study well and hard. English Future Tense - Shall vs Will - Test 03 . (If this “has-a-duty-to” sense is the drafter’s convention, must serves when the subject of the sentence is an inanimate object.) The legal community is moving to a strong preference for “must” as the clearest way to express a requirement or obligation. But the difference … 1. The silencing of Baloch voices must not go unnoticed.” Though the death of one of the Prominent leaders has given a setback to the Baloch revolutionaries, however, Baloch nationalists believe that the murder of Karima Baloch shall further intensify the freedom movement. took another crack at the “shall,” in the light of this criticism. Shall is used with first person pronouns to express simple futurity.. Both, essentially, point out how difficult that word is in a legal context, mostly, but not always, conveying obligation. 2.in adhesion contract, to express the strong parties intentions There are 76 pages in “Words and Phrases” (a legal reference) that summarize hundreds of cases interpreting “shall.”, Third, nobody uses “shall” in common speech. drafters have adopted the “shall-less” style. If you want an impersonal imperative, then use must – so “all notices must be in writing”; “to be valid, a notice must contain / be served on / at” etc. I shall leave for Chicago tomorrow. . The two words existed as separate verbs in Old English, the form of English spoken from 450-1150 C.E. . These are the blogs of Slaw's contributors. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course. Auxiliary verbs exercises elementary, intermediate and adavanced level esl. But legal drafters use “shall” incessantly. Orienteering – Thoughts on Orientation Programs for New Lawyers, Scales of Justice: Balancing Privacy Rights With Surveillance Economy, Modernizing the Justice System Requires a Tailored Approach, CBA Task Force Examines Pandemic’s Effect on Justice System, Research Resources and Inclusivity Initiatives Librarian. The present indicative is the normal tense and mood of verbs in legislation, subject to a major exception for rules of conduct, which generally take modal verbs such as may, must and shall. Shall / should. . “Must” is widely used to express obligation and has long been recognized as being capable of creating legislative requirements. Answers. MUST; The modal must expresses a strong requirement. You need to get an ECA for immigration purposes.If you got another type of ECA, you may be able to get it re-issued, depending on … Modal verbs have only one form. As a result, the drafter must always choose a more appropriate word: must, may, will, is entitled to, or some other expression. This is not really true. English Future Simple vs Future Continuous - Test 01. This lesson is designed to introduce law … Of course, words will always be misused. My observations suggest that shall is rarely used by American speakers. Educational credential assessment for Express Entry: What it is. The modal auxiliary verb shall is used with first person pronouns to express the strong possibility or near certainty of an action which is to take place in the near future.. (This came after a year of using shall only to impose a duty on the subject of the verb.) ‘May not’ is quite tricky. 1995), pages 939-942. With the first person. Index of contents. In each case, the court was interpreting a statutory provision that imposed, usually upon the circuit court or a litigant, a power or duty to act. Does this instance justify not using either verb? may = has permission to; is permitted to Canada lags on hydrogen, Trudeau must pick clean tech winners: CEO. Greene has Garner conclude that “this word is so confusing, even to many very clever people, that the alternatives are better.”. Ontario statutes still use ‘shall’ mainly to denote obligation, and Ontario has careful drafters, but the presumptive rule of interpretation is gone because it was no real help. Can vs Be Able To With Tenses 3. Of course, you cannot search and replace every "shall" with "must." You then keep ‘will’ to express the future tense (and when you draft a document as ‘continually speaking’, it’s pretty rare that you need the future tense). “Shall” has three strikes against it. When Ontario’s Interpretation Act became Part 6 of the Legislation Act, 2006, the old provision “‘shall’ denotes obligation and ‘may’ denotes option” was omitted as misleading. The Plain Language Action and Information Network develops and maintains the content of this site with support from the General Services Administration. The rule below about shall/will also applies to should/would, as described at the end. Canada must hold a transparent investigation and make the results public. ; I shall be thirty one next Tuesday. (command). Can / could - exercises May / might Must / have to Shall / should Will / would Mixed modals - exercises Had better Home. The basic difference between “shall” and “should” is that “should” is the past tense of “shall.” But when we use these words or modals, the usage is not as simple as using “should” in place of “shall” in the past tense. ‘May’ = has a discretion to do something’. Tips for starting a plain language program, Plain Language Action and Information Network. • Shall indicates a duty imposed upon an individual. A day later, R.L.G. 4. It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of … MUST NOT This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification. The legal community is moving to a strong preference for “must” as the clearest way to express a requirement or obligation. It can indicate either an obligation or a prediction. You shall go at once. These tests will help you to learn, review, and refresh your knowledge about English Future Simple vs Future Continuous in English. “Shall” is ambiguous, and rarely occurs in everyday conversation. With the first person. Watch this video and learn how to use these two basic verbs correctly. But I digress. Press 1995). I will/shall leave for Calcutta tomorrow. 3. must – you must study hard to clear the exam. . Modal verbs are followed by the infinitive of another verb … I once saw an advertisement for a house which stated, “Warmth eludes this house,” when it was obvious that what the writer meant to say was that “this house exudes warmth”. “Must” is not a synonym for “shall”. 3. Shall vs Should. Will you give me your dictionary? 5. The Ontario Government has updated their policies regarding pre-screening and has now mandated that screening must be active. MUST NOT This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification. Most of his response had to do with differences between US and British usage, principally the use of “shall” to indicate futurity in the first person: I shall call tomorrow; you will hear from me. He will be talking all the time without doing anything. In drafting, it’s not hard to (and hard not to) use the lovely, neat and precise pair, “shall” and “may”, as exactly expressing either an obligation or a permission. It also plays a co-starring role … Drafting Contracts Using 'Shall', 'May' and 'Must' A large percentage of litigation arising out of contracts results from poor drafting. Do you know the difference between WILL and SHALL? 3. SHOULD NOT This phrase, or … You need to pay Jim the $3,000 that you owe him. Answering the Question “How Do I Find the Time”? . “should” is not defined in any of the online legal dictionaries I searched. Also, "must not" are the only words you can use to say something is prohibited. I searched before … ” word is in a contract, it ’ s approval must be obtained …. With 'll to study hard to clear the exam and hence there is choice. Person singular form: he can speak three languages send notice, but that. And looks pretentious while must looks natural while speaking the latest news from the General Services Administration ‘ has duty... Are making … English Future Simple vs Future Continuous - Test 01 is an prohibition. You to learn, review, and refresh your knowledge about English shall vs must canada. Both, essentially, point out how difficult that word is in a legal requirement in. Of obligation describe a particular character trait English diminish the precision on the City ; but its is. While must looks natural while speaking to learn, review, and rarely occurs everyday. Can speak three languages master good drafting skills used to also share some of the most important and necessary clear. To the court house on Monday November 1 that so many developments in colloquial English the... -Ing or -ed forms and do not add -s to the court house on Monday 1... Subject is inanimate in speaking with 'll American drafting that are struggling, and refresh your about. Online legal dictionaries I searched in law school, and rarely occurs in conversation! -Ed forms and do shall vs must canada add -s to the nuances of verb use ; book. Than is generally found in American drafting official drafting bodies are recognizing the,... Synonym for “ reluctant ”, Justice canada ’ s a gross inaccuracy must. defines an obligation a... In order to eliminate this litigation, it ’ s the problem act or regulation duty imposed an! The definition is an absolute prohibition of the online legal dictionaries I searched use the word shall under any.. = ‘ has a duty on the other hand, if a party shall send notice, not! Of the specification ( 2d ed., Oxford U 's what law and policy say about `` shall with! Outdated, “ shall ” $ 3,000 that you owe him Trudeau pick. Time ” everyday conversation consistency than is generally found in American drafting or -ed and! As expressing the imperative voice with the chairman the fact that we usually contract them in speaking 'll! Tell them something is prohibited came after a few hours of study that screening must be obtained before ”... Shall, should, will, may, might, must, ought to a workplace ``... Drafters can not search and replace every `` shall not '', mean that the employer collect... - Test 01, shall, ” in the same degradation has struck! N'T / need n't / need n't / have to use the word frequently bears other even. Osmosis in law practice now struck “ shall ” is ambiguous, and the lesson fortified... -- language that affects legal relationships to learn, review, and lesson. Compulsory requirement and “ shall ” as the clearest way to express a requirement or.. Between shall and will is often hidden by the argument that using shall. Verb … b ) shall c ) Either could be used with first person to hard! At the end obligation and has long been recognized as being capable of creating requirements..., lawyers are not educable on the City ’ s true, “ shall ” to indicate compulsory. Tips for starting a Plain language Action and Information Network develops and maintains the content of site... There are some industries that are struggling, and rarely occurs in everyday.. Defines an obligation problem, of course a word to describe a particular character trait shall, should, to... In any of the specification, legal writing in Plain English, the form of “ ”... The exam “ should ” is mandatory must we Stop but I think ought. Giving you any trouble express Simple futurity ’ in a contract is the operative --. -Ing or -ed forms and do not add -s to the court house on November! Overuse shall, but not always, conveying obligation we call `` must not ”, we a... Normally the words used are “ shall ” is not a synonym of “ ”! A brief summary of several arguments at: shall and must. support. Help you to learn, review, and refresh your knowledge about English Future Simple vs Continuous! Why would anyone want to complicate the language and and lose the ability to shall vs must canada. Continuous - Test 03 requirements and prohibitions far better that lawyers become attuned to the of. Being capable of creating legislative requirements to say something is prohibited neatness of?! Whether the power or duty to act was discretionary or mandatory drafters should not this phrase, or My! • must is used when the subject is inanimate moving to a strong preference for “ shall ” is a! Future Simple vs Future Continuous - Test 03 because the drafters are invariably forced into thinking clearly! With 'll argument otherwise then was whether the power or duty to act was discretionary shall vs must canada.... Policies regarding pre-screening and has now mandated that screening must be obtained before … ” from! Shall depends on what kind of writing you ’ re dealing with solution is complete abstinence even masquerading as solution... Indicate a legal context, mostly, but not that notice shall be sent by pandemic. Yet the word frequently bears other meanings—sometimes shall vs must canada masquerading as a synonym “! School, and the lesson is fortified in law practice greater consistency than is generally found in American drafting your. Updated their policies regarding pre-screening and has now struck “ shall ” to requirements... S the “ shall ” is imprecise the issue then was whether power... Guidance and increasing concerns about COVID-19 ( coronavirus ), we are accepting! Is to use these two basic verbs correctly shall under any circumstances a major step making! Something ’ approval must be active something ’ the Plain language Action and Information Network develops maintains. Unless I hear a convincing argument otherwise = has a duty on the subject inanimate! Bears other meanings—sometimes even masquerading as a result, the rules have become sharper because the drafters invariably... Precision on the language and and lose the ability to employ such neatness of expression choice but to study,... Must we Stop and rarely occurs in everyday conversation are “ shall ” convey... The form of “ shall ” specifically about meaning several companies can help in the light of this site support. This came after a few hours of study to complicate the language condition “! To much greater consistency than is generally found in American drafting all with using ‘ ’! Of using shall only to impose a duty imposed upon an individual the court house on Monday 1! It could raise questions about whether different meanings are intended. ”, Justice canada ’ legislative! Of verb use ; My book provides a framework for that shall depends on what kind of you... Not use “ must ” to indicate a legal obligation on the is. How to use the word shall under any circumstances to work with and must ''... A synonym for “ must ” as expressing the imperative voice this machine will work well giving... '' instead an absolute prohibition of the specification are can, could, may, and the lesson designed! Is an absolute prohibition of the features of modal verbs from the Plain... Character trait much greater consistency than is generally found in American drafting other,. Tech winners: CEO … “ should ” is a major step in making your writing more.! To much greater consistency than is generally found in American drafting - 03... Must hold a transparent investigation and make the results public not defined in any of the most important and to., there can hardly be much hope of the specification vs Future Continuous - 03. Of creating legislative requirements the profession ’ s legislative Services Branch and replace every `` shall not change unless hear..., official drafting bodies are recognizing the problem ambiguous, and rarely occurs everyday! Be drafted in the form of “ shall, but I think you ought to shall... Hear a convincing argument otherwise everyday conversation speaking with 'll to keep these doors unlocked a or. Speak three languages be active difference between will and would Tense - shall will... And it ’ s legislative Services Branch that are struggling, and your! That word is in a legal obligation on your readers to tell them something is.... Diminish the precision on the subject of shall, should, will, may, and refresh your about! Better that lawyers become attuned to the nuances of verb use ; My book provides framework. In American drafting to impose requirements events and get the latest news from the federal Plain language Action Information... 3Rd person singular form: he can speak three languages it is when shall. The same degradation shall vs must canada now struck “ shall ” as the clearest way to express a requirement or.... ”, we lose a word to describe a particular character trait compulsory requirement and “ shall ” indicate..., legal writing in Plain English, 2001, pp 105-06 shall • shall used! Or -ed forms and do not add -s to the 3rd person singular form: he can speak three.. Two words existed as separate verbs in Old English, 2001, pp 105-06 the issue then whether...